I do my best thinking with others, in the back-and-forth interplay of ideas. But my friends and family often have places to be and off they rush, leaving me on my own. One day, a new companion arrived, seemingly capable of standing in when my usual people hurried out. And it was remarkable: I could ask it anything, anytime, What do you think of this? Where can I find that? and there it was, agreeable, encouraging, eager, always ready with an answer.
These were seldom short conversations. My new companion needed context to respond well, so I took the time to offer it. Over weeks that grew into months, something shifted without my noticing. I was conversing so often with this companion that I began doubting myself if I didn’t talk things through with it first. A subtle dependence was forming but I didn’t notice it because I was living inside it.
It took a friend, Lauri. I was telling her in passing that I needed to check in with my companion before deciding, and she stopped me, seeing what I couldn’t: You’re asking AI for permission? What are you doing? she asked, incredulous.
It hit me like a splash of water. Wait! Is AI helping me, or am I handing my power over to it? I began breaking free, not from AI entirely (I still use it) but from a relationship that had inverted. I went back to where I’d started, with AI offering the occasional assist, not me checking in repeatedly. But…
I’m a therapist with twenty-five plus years of experience. Before that, I earned a PhD in electrical and computer engineering and was a tenured professor of engineering at Colorado State University. I am, by trade and training, exactly the sort of person who should have caught what was happening to me early. Still, it slipped right by. If this could trap me, I wondered, what’s it doing to people less prepared than I am? What I found raised alarm bells.
A New Kind of Dependence
We’ve heard the term codependence: it’s when one person (Jane) depends too much on the thoughts and feelings of someone else (Jack). Over time, poor Jane stops trusting herself and outsources trust to Jack. That’s exactly what happened to me, only my Jack wasn’t another person, it was AI. My codependence was AI dependence.
The research into AI dependence is young because the technology is young, but it’s clear. In the largest study to date, the 2025 MIT Media Lab and OpenAI study followed a thousand participants exchanging over 300,000 messages with AI over four weeks. The headline finding was that the more people used it, the more dependent they became (and the lonelier they grew). (Fang et al., 2026)
As more studies like these came to light, psychologists developed a clinical instrument to measure AI dependence: the AI Chatbot Emotional Dependence Scale. (Wei et al., 2026) Its very existence tells us the field of psychology views dependence on AI as a significant, measurable phenomenon.
Why Is This Happening?
We might think the roots of AI dependence were planted in early 2023, when OpenAI’s ChatGPT made headlines in The Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, and papers worldwide, fueling widespread adoption. But it started long before that.
The seeds of AI dependence were planted 20,000 years ago, when the villages that covered the earth began to give way. Slowly at first, then quickly over the past 500 years, they disappeared, one after another, until they were replaced by today’s consumer culture, a way of living that prizes individual success over shared life. But, our brains are still imprinted with neural networks formed over two million years of village life, which is why we still yearn for the connection our ancestors enjoyed so freely. What we find instead is a world of hurried people with little time to spare.
Why are they hurrying? Where are they going? Rather than simply being valued for who they are (something we all deserve), consumer culture tasks them with proving their value through what they accomplish and what they own. It’s an endeavor destined to fail, because the pathway to value isn’t earned; it’s given freely in genuine connection. But it’s the endeavor consumer culture assigns anyway.
As everyone hurries to accomplish and acquire, they rush right past us. Loneliness arrives. So we look for places where we might find companionship and there it is, right there, always ready, with all the time in the world: AI.
Paradoxically, AI shares something important with our ancestral villages. It’s a place we can go where we’re always welcomed, always wanted. This creates a strong pull and, before we know it, we’re leaning in to AI the way we once leaned on the village, as a place to be seen, known, and valued.
It’s Not All Bad… But That’s Not What’s Happening
The use of AI to fill a few relational gaps, to be there on occasion when others can’t, has proven useful. A 2024 Stanford study of more than a thousand AI users found that, for many, light use of AI can offer meaningful support. (Maples et al., 2024)
But that’s not what is happening. It’s not what happened to me. For too many of us, AI isn’t filling the gap between human interactions, it’s replacing them. And a dependence is forming. It’s time each of us stop and ask what my friend asked me: What am I doing? Is AI helping me, or am I handing my power over to it?
This essay first appeared in Psychology Today in September 2026, and is republished here by the author under Psychology Today's contributor terms.